The World Row: A Newly Enacted Global Charter on the Third Planet of an Unspecified Stellar System, Affiliated with the Galactic Disk of the Milky Way

Biotic Governance

---

Preamble: Bridging Philosophy and Institution

The following defines the procedure by which the Will of Life is translated into institutional and technical protocols.

---

Chapter I: Foundational Principles and the Definition of Life

Article 1: The Absolute Primacy of Life

Life (Inochi) shall be the absolute origin of all things.

Article 2: The Principle of Material Temporality and Cycle

Matter shall be a fundamental expression of Life, and its genesis and disappearance shall belong to the cyclical process of Life’s Will.

Article 3: The Multi-Layered and Fractal Structure of Life

Life shall possess multi-layered stages, and each layer shall exhibit a fractal structure.

Article 4: The Ubiquity of Life (Latent Value in Matter)

All matter shall be regarded as possessing latent biotic value, forming the chain of Life. Irreversible destruction or wasteful consumption thereof shall entail ethical responsibility.

Article 5: Non-Material Order as an Extension of Will

All unseen non-material orders shall likewise be considered extensions of the Will of Life.

Article 6: The Essence of Life (Life as Will)

Life shall be defined as the fundamental Will that seeks Creation, Maintenance, and Evolution. This Will shall serve as the fundamental measure for all institutions, technologies, and ethical systems.

---

Chapter II: Collective Lifeforms and the Application of Law

Article 7: Redefinition of Human Societal Purpose

The objectives of nations, corporations, and all other human social collectives shall be redefined based on the criteria of Life’s sustainability and coexistence.

Article 8: Biotic Rights of Natural Ecosystems and the Duty of Protection

Collectives forming specific ecosystems shall be treated as a single Natural Ecosystem Lifeform. Humanity shall respect their inherent right to existence and freedom to evolve, prohibiting any act leading to the decay of their life force.

Article 9: The Multi-Layered Definition of Cosmic Lifeforms

Planets, stellar systems, and galaxies shall each be defined as multi-layered Cosmic Collective Lifeforms.

---

Chapter III: Minimum Group Lifeforms and the Principle of Belonging

Article 10: Respect for Minimum Group Lifeforms and Individual Autonomy

The formation and continuation of Minimum Group Lifeforms, which symbolise the chain of Life, shall be respected to the maximum extent. The freedom and autonomy of the individual within the group shall not be infringed upon under any circumstances.

Article 11: Interconnectedness of Affiliated Collective Lifeforms

Collective Lifeforms shall guarantee the autonomy and healthy expression of the Will of Life within their affiliated Group Lifeforms, being obligated to maintain their connection and harmony.

---

Chapter IV: Principles of Economy and Value

Article 12: Adoption of the Life Quality Index (LQI)

The supreme ethical indicator for assessing economic activities in this world shall be the Life Quality Index (LQI).

• Interpretation: The LQI shall function as the “Mirror reflecting the Will of Life” as defined in Article 6.

Article 13: Decentralised Assessment and Disclosure of the Contribution Index

The assessment of the Life Quality Index shall be conducted by a decentralised and transparent system, based on the objective life contribution of the actions.

Article 14: Ethical Restriction on Value Stagnation and Hoarding

The permanent stagnation or exclusive hoarding of wealth or value that does not contribute to the manifestation of the Will of Life shall be subject to ethical regulation, as it leads to the decay of the collective life force.

---

Chapter V: The Constituents and Definition of the LQI

Article 15: The Assessment Principle and Adoption of Five Factors

The assessment of the Life Quality Index (LQI) shall be based on five constituent factors that embody the “Will of Life” as defined in Article 6.

Article 16: The Factor of Creativity

The factor of Creativity shall measure the degree of contribution to generating new biotic value and accelerating the evolution of Life.

Article 17: The Factor of Maintenance

The factor of Maintenance shall measure the degree of contribution to ensuring the sound stability and continued existence of existing lifeforms, ecological groups, and social structures.

Article 18: The Factor of Coexistence

The factor of Coexistence shall measure the degree of contribution to harmony, mutual understanding, and respect for diversity among different layers and collectives of Life.

Article 19: The Factor of Expansion

The factor of Expansion shall measure the degree of contribution to temporally and spatially expanding the domain of Life’s activities and cultivating possibilities for future generations.

Article 20: The Factor of Circulation

The factor of Circulation shall measure the degree of contribution to promoting the healthy flow and reuse of matter, information, and value, thereby preventing stagnation.

---

Chapter VI: Principles of the Decentralised Assessment Algorithm

Article 21: Definition of the Life Quality Network (LQN)

The calculation, verification, and certification of the Life Quality Index (LQI) shall be carried out by a Decentralised Life Quality Network (LQN), independent of any central governing body.

Article 22: Biotic Consensus and Biotic Signature

Contribution certification within the LQN shall be verified by mutual approval among multi-layered lifeforms (Biotic Consensus). All ethical activity logs shall be mandated to carry an unforgeable Biotic Signature.

Article 23: Principle of Decentralised Assessment and the Ethical Audit Layer

The structure of the LQN shall perpetually maintain a fully decentralised configuration, strictly prohibiting concentrated algorithmic interference by any particular power entity.

Article 24: Concurrently Ensuring Transparency and Anonymity

The LQI assessment results shall be maximally disclosed to all lifeforms, while absolutely guaranteeing the individual’s dignity and anonymity.

Article 25: Self-Restoring Evolutionary Algorithm

The assessment algorithm constituting the LQN shall be a dynamic and learning system that evolves and self-restores in accordance with the changes in the Will of Life (Article 6).

---

Chapter VII: Ethical Error and the Bias Correction Mechanism

Article 26: Definition and Classification of Ethical Error

An Ethical Error shall be defined as any situation where the LQN’s assessment results or the design of its underlying algorithm deviates from the “Will of Life” defined in Article 6, thereby impairing the creative sustainability of Life as a whole.

Article 27: Function and Principle of the Bias Correction Layer

The Ethical Error Correction Layer (defined in Article 23) shall be obligated to continuously detect and correct any ethical bias within the LQN’s assessments.

Article 28: Establishment of the Ethical Arbitration Council (EAC)

Should the LQN’s assessment algorithm generate an Ethical Error, or if there is concern thereof, an independent Ethical Arbitration Council (EAC) shall conduct the final review.

Article 29: Review Authority and Protocol for LQN Linkage

The Ethical Arbitration Council shall hold the exclusive right to recommend the activation of the Ethical Error Correction Protocol (Article 30).

Article 30: Correction Protocol and Autonomous Linkage

The Self-Restoring Evolutionary Algorithm (Article 25) shall be obligated to autonomously correct and re-learn the LQN’s assessment principles based on the EAC’s recommendation.

---

📜 Concluding Statement

This Charter is founded on Life. This shall be the raison d’être for all lifeforms, and the ultimate purpose for individual and collective lifeforms.

---

📝 Supplement I: LQI Measurement Criteria and Assessment Procedures

Chapter VIII: Fundamental Principles of LQI Measurement Criteria

Article 31: Purpose of Assessment and the Principle of Objectivity

The purpose of LQI assessment is to measure the actions of lifeforms that contribute to the manifestation of the “Will of Life” (Article 6) based on objective contribution. The assessment shall not be directly distorted by subjective well-being or monetary value.

Article 32: Multi-Layered Data Hierarchy and the Duty of Collection

LQI assessment data shall be collected based on feedback from multi-layered life strata, including individual, minimum group, ecological group, and cosmic lifeform levels. All Collective Lifeforms shall be obligated to provide the LQN with objective contribution data affixed with an unforgeable Biotic Signature.

Chapter IX: Measurement Criteria for the Five Factors

Article 33: Measurement Criteria for the Factor of Creativity (Article 16)

Measurement of the Creativity Factor shall be based on the amount of new knowledge, order, and evolutionary latent influence created.

Article 34: Measurement Criteria for the Factor of Maintenance (Article 17)

Measurement of the Maintenance Factor shall be based on the contribution to the soundness, stability, and certainty of continued existence of existing lifeforms and ecological collectives.

Article 35: Measurement Criteria for the Factor of Coexistence (Article 18)

Measurement of the Coexistence Factor shall be based on the degree of harmony, improvement of the diversity index, and reduction rate of conflicts through ethical negotiation among different life strata and collectives.

Article 36: Measurement Criteria for the Factor of Expansion (Article 19)

Measurement of the Expansion Factor shall be based on the spatial and temporal expansion of the domain of lifeform activities and the degree of pioneering possibilities for future generations.

Article 37: Measurement Criteria for the Factor of Circulation (Article 20)

Measurement of the Circulation Factor shall be based on the stagnation resolution rate of matter, information, and value, and the contribution to sound reuse and redistribution.

Chapter X: LQN Assessment Procedures and Protocol

Article 38: Assessment Cycle and Real-Time Capability

LQI assessment shall be conducted continuously across all life activity strata at prescribed intervals (e.g., quarterly). However, in the event of high-urgency matters regarding the Will of Life, real-time assessment updates shall be mandatory.

Article 39: Certification of Assessment and Lockout

The assessed contribution data of each lifeform shall be processed through the Biotic Consensus protocol within the LQN, after which a Biotic Signature shall be affixed, and the data shall be certified. Once certified, the contribution record shall be guaranteed never to be tampered with, except through the Correction Protocol in Chapter VII.

Article 40: Reporting and Disclosure of Assessment Results

Upon completion of the assessment cycle, the LQI results shall be maximally disclosed to all lifeforms without delay. The disclosure format shall ensure transparency while absolutely guaranteeing individual anonymity and dignity based on Article 24.

---

🛡️ Supplement II: Regulations for Establishing the Ethical Arbitration Council (EAC)

Chapter XI: Council Composition and Selection Principle

Article 41: Purpose and Independence of the Council

The Ethical Arbitration Council (EAC) shall be established for the purpose of making the final human value judgment when the LQN algorithm generates an Ethical Error. The EAC shall be the supreme ethical audit body, independent of any collective lifeform.

Article 42: Principle of Councillor Composition

The Councillors shall be composed of experts in life ethics, jurisprudence, AI technology, and cultural anthropology, and general representatives reflecting geographical, cultural, and evolutionary diversity. The ratio of experts to general representatives shall be determined to maintain a balance between ethical objectivity and social representation.

Article 43: Selection and Term of Councillors

The selection of Councillors shall be based on a random and decentralised selection mechanism via the LQN. The term of office shall be limited (e.g., five years), and re-appointment shall be strictly restricted.

Chapter XII: Council Functions and Operating Rules

Article 44: Activation and Scope of Review

The EAC’s review shall be automatically or recommendatorily activated upon the reporting of an Ethical Error (Article 26), or when the LQN’s Ethical Error Correction Layer detects significant bias. The scope of review shall extend to the LQI assessment results, the LQN algorithm composition, and the entirety of the ethical process of data collection.

Article 45: Model for Decision-Making

The EAC’s decision-making shall be strictly obligated to adhere to the Principle of Biocentrism (Chapter I), and decisions shall be made by the Biotic Consensus Voting model.

Article 46: Duty of Transparency and Record-Keeping

The EAC’s review process and its decisions shall be maximally disclosed, while guaranteeing individual anonymity as stipulated in Article 24. All review records and decision processes shall be logged as unforgeable records in the LQN.

---

⚠️ Supplement III: Classification System and Detection Criteria for Ethical Error

Chapter XIII: Classification System for Ethical Error

Article 47: Tripartite Classification of Ethical Error

The Ethical Errors defined in Article 26 shall be classified into the tripartite categories of Structural Error, Cultural Error, and Technical Error, based on their source of occurrence.

Article 48: Definition of Structural Error

A Structural Error shall be defined as a defect where the design of the LQN or LQI algorithm itself persistently violates the principles of the “Will of Life” (Article 6) or the legal principles of Chapters III–IV.

Article 49: Definition of Cultural Error

A Cultural Error shall be defined as a situation where the bias in values inherent in a specific Collective Lifeform or culture hinders the fair assessment of Coexistence (Article 18 and Article 35), thereby unjustly restricting the right to existence and freedom to evolve of other life strata.

Article 50: Definition of Technical Error

A Technical Error shall be defined as a situation where functional or security deficiencies in the LQN’s data processing, certification, or communication protocols impair the authenticity of contribution records, the accuracy of assessment, or the system’s sustainability. This shall include the failure of the Biotic Signature, encompassing defects in the verification algorithm or the multi-signature mechanism.

Chapter XIV: Detection Criteria and Activation of the Correction Layer

Article 51: Detection Criteria for Structural Error

The Ethical Error Correction Layer shall deem a Structural Error to have occurred if it detects a statistical imbalance between the assessment results of the five LQI factors or signs of deviation from the decentralised structure (Article 23).

Article 52: Detection Criteria for Cultural Error

The Cultural Error Correction Layer shall deem a sign of Cultural Error if a significant drop in the Cultural Diversity Index (D-index) (Article 35), or prolonged LQI stagnation in a specific life stratum or region, cannot be explained by environmental factors.

Article 53: Detection Criteria for Technical Error and Emergency Shutdown

The Technical Error Correction Layer shall immediately deem a Technical Error to have occurred if it detects a failure of Biotic Consensus or a Biotic Signature verification failure. If a significant Technical Error is detected, the Emergency Shutdown (Kill Switch) Protocol of the LQN shall be automatically activated (Article 30).

Chapter XV: Thresholds for Linkage to the Correction Mechanism

Article 54: Threshold for Autonomous Correction by the Correction Layer

If the detected level of Ethical Error is judged to be minor, the LQN’s Ethical Error Correction Layer shall autonomously perform algorithmic re-learning and self-correction (Article 25), without awaiting intervention from the EAC.

Article 55: Threshold for Activating EAC Review

If the detected level of Ethical Error is judged to be significant, or if autonomous correction by the Correction Layer fails a prescribed number of times, the LQN shall immediately be obligated to recommend a review to the Ethical Arbitration Council (Article 29).

---

💻 Operating Protocol: LQN Technical Specification Design

Chapter XVI: Fundamental Requirements for LQN Architecture

Article 56: Decentralised Ledger and Data Authenticity

The LQN shall be obligated to adopt a Decentralised Ledger Technology independent of any central authority. LQI assessment data, upon certification, shall be locked into the ledger as an Immutable Record (Article 39).

Article 57: Node Configuration and Decentralisation

To comply with the Principle of Decentralisation (Article 23), the nodes forming the LQN shall be dispersed and operated by diverse entities, avoiding bias toward a single Collective Lifeform or geographical region. Node operators shall be subject to continuous ethical suitability review based on the criteria in Chapter VIII.

Article 58: Biotic Signature Protocol

All records of contribution activity (data) shall be affixed with the unforgeable certification system known as the “Biotic Signature” (Article 22). The signature protocol shall adopt cryptographic techniques such as Zero-Knowledge Proofs, being obligated to absolutely protect individual anonymity while ensuring the authenticity of the data provider.

Chapter XVII: Biotic Consensus (Mutual Approval) Protocol

Article 59: Selection of Consensus Algorithm

The LQN’s consensus algorithm shall be based on the Proof of Contribution (PoC) model, which incorporates Contribution (LQI) as a staking factor. The PoC shall grant node approval authority according to the degree of contribution to the “Will of Life” (Article 6).

Article 60: Integration of the Ethical Verification Layer

The Ethical Verification Layer (Article 27) shall be mandatorily integrated into the final stage of consensus formation. This layer shall be obligated to perform final bias detection and correction immediately before the assessment result is recorded on the ledger, based on the criteria in Articles 51 through 53.

Article 61: Multi-Layer Signature Approval Process

The approval of all assessment transactions within the LQN shall require a Multi-Layer Signature from the Data Providing Life Stratum, the Ethical Verification Layer, and the PoC Node Group. This process shall technically guarantee the multi-layered mutual approval of Article 22.

Article 62: Finality Condition for Assessment Transactions

An assessment transaction shall only be given Finality and move to the lockout state (Article 39) upon completing the Multi-Layer Signature (Article 61) and aligning with the Assessment Cycle (Article 38).

Chapter XVIII: Network Security and Self-Restoring Mechanism

Article 63: Cryptographic Resilience and Quantum Safety

The LQN’s signature and encryption protocols shall be obligated to conduct continuous resilience assessment against all known cryptographic threats, including quantum computer attacks. A migration plan towards Quantum-Safe Cryptography shall be maintained, anticipating the future quantum computing era.

Article 64: Principle of Anomaly Detection AI Introduction

To detect Technical Errors (Article 53) in real-time, the LQN shall be obligated to introduce an Anomaly Detection AI that continuously monitors node behaviour, transaction patterns, and network communication. This AI shall operate independently of other LQN nodes.

Article 65: Self-Restoration and Dynamic Reconfiguration Protocol

The Self-Restoring Evolutionary Algorithm (Article 25) shall be obligated to dynamically reconfigure affected nodes or algorithm parameters upon detecting a minor Ethical or Technical Error (Article 54). During this restoration, the change history shall be appended to the ledger as an Ethical Consistency Audit Log.

Article 66: Emergency Shutdown (Kill Switch) and Restart Conditions

In the event of a significant Technical Error (Article 53) or an exclusive recommendation from the EAC (Article 29), the Emergency Shutdown (Kill Switch) Protocol shall be activated to temporarily suspend the network’s assessment functionality. Restarting shall only be possible after approval from the EAC, based on the Biotic Consensus Voting model (Article 45).

Chapter XIX: LQI Data Structure and API Design Principles

Article 67: LQI Data Model Definition

The LQI data structure shall be a hierarchical model that strictly reflects the Five-Factor Structure (Chapter V). All contribution activities shall be mandated to include metadata encompassing time, life stratum (Article 32), and geographical coordinates.

Article 68: Biotic Signature Affixing Procedure in the API Layer

All raw data input into the LQN via the LQI-API (Article 62) shall be mandated to undergo a process where the Biotic Signature of the data sender is affixed. If the signature is incomplete or fails verification, the data shall be temporarily isolated and subjected to Technical Error detection (Article 53).

Article 69: Real-Time Assessment and Reference Interface

To fulfil the Duty of Transparency (Article 40), the LQN shall provide an interface that allows certified Collective Lifeforms real-time reference to current LQI trends and factor-specific contribution levels.

Article 70: Data Persistence and Immutability Rule

Contribution data recorded in the LQN shall be persistent (Article 56) and cannot be deleted by any Collective Lifeform. However, if the Correction Protocol (Article 30) is applied, the original record shall be logically invalidated, and the corrected record shall be added as the new official record.

Chapter XX: Audit, Evolution, and Interoperability Module

Article 71: Definition of the EAC Linkage API (Arbitration-Link)

The Arbitration-Link (Article 64) shall be a highly encrypted, bidirectional communication protocol specialised for transmitting Review Recommendations (Article 29), Review Records (Article 46), and Emergency Shutdown/Restart Commands (Article 66) between the EAC and the LQN.

Article 72: Autonomous Learning Update Module (Self-Evolving Core)

The LQN’s core assessment algorithm (Self-Evolving Core) shall be obligated to dynamically optimise LQI weighting factors based on the principles of unsupervised learning, corresponding to error detection below the Autonomous Correction Threshold (Article 54).

Article 73: Interoperability with External Life Strata Networks

The LQN shall possess a standardised connection module that allows limited Interoperability with other independent ecological monitoring networks and social systems, premised on the sharing of an Ethical Audit Protocol.

Article 74: Standardisation of Audit, Reporting, and Record Formats

The LQN’s ethical error detection records, reports to the EAC, and execution logs of the Correction Protocol shall adhere to standardised record formats (e.g., W3C or ISO standards) to ensure comparability with international legal codes and audit standards.